CIRO GÓMEZ LEYVA....
"Lo que nos pase nos lo mereceremos por no tener memoria histórica o por vender nuestra dignidad"
Ciro Gomez Leyva
La desvergüenza de Moreira.
La primera conmoción nacional por los secuestros ocurrió a mediados de los 90, con los casos Harp, Vargas, Losada, Senderos. México estaba gobernado por el PRI. Los guaruras se centuplicaron.
Cuando en 1994 y 1995 las bandas de secuestradores de La Víbora, Los Aparicio, Los Tlaycas tomaron Morelos, la entidad era gobernada por el priista Jorge Carrillo Olea, un especialista en seguridad. Quedó registro de la complicidad entre criminales y policías. El director de la Policía Judicial morelense era una leyenda policiaca del PRI: el capitán Jesús Miyazawa. El apogeo de los cárteles de la droga en Jalisco comprendió también el periodo del gobernador priista Enrique Alvarez del Castillo, a quien luego el priista Carlos Salinas de Gortari nombró Procurador General de la República. El auge de los cárteles y el crimen en Sinaloa se dio entre gobernadores priistas: Antonio Toledo Corro, Francisco Labastida y Renato Vega. Con el argumento de que poco pueden hacer con la migración, los municipios conurbados del Estado de México han sido desde el priista Carlos Hank González hasta el priista Enrique Peña Nieto, zona franca para delincuentes grandes y pequeños. Chihuahua es hoy la entidad más violenta del país. El PRI la gobierna desde hace diez años. Ni qué decir de Tamaulipas, Coahuila, Durango, Oaxaca...
Con una desvergüenza del tamaño de la desgracia, el presidente del PRI, Humberto Moreira, culpó a los "otros" por la presente tragedia de la inseguridad. Y perfiló a su partido como el único que en el futuro puede encararla y doblarla. Su partido, el de Cosío Vidaurri, Cavazos Lerma, Natividad Paras, Yarrington y Montiel. Desvergüenza: dicho o hecho impúdico o insolente.
Desvergüenza, la de Moreira. Y la del PRI: la opción de la experiencia !!! A ESTO LE LLAMO DESCARO Y CINISMO...... Y ¿a éstos elegiremos para que nos vuelvan a gobernar...??? Pobre México, pobre República, Sólo un país tercermundista reelige a sus dictadores....Ya vemos a Salinas frotándose las manos detrás de su niño bonito Peña Nieto, de los Mexicanos depende, .....y probablemente nos lo merezcamos por apáticos, sin civismo ni amor a esta tierra...... TRISTE REALIDAD DE NUESTRO MÉXICO.
si tienes coraje reenvialo. La libertad aún no la tenemos, hay que luchar por ella..
Estaba Saddam Hussein hablando con Dios y le pregunta: ¿Cómo estará Irak dentro de 10 añosy Dios le contesta: "Estará todo destruido por las bombas enviadas por los Estados Unidos" Saddam se sentó...... y lloró.
Estaba Bush hablando con Dios y le pregunta: ¿Cómo estará América dentro de 10 años? Dios le contesta: "Estará totalmente contaminada por las bombas químicas enviadas por Irán" Bush se sentó..... y lloró.
Estaba Enrique Peña Nieto hablando con Dios y le pregunta: Dios, ¿cómo estará Mexico dentro de 10 años si soy elegido presidente"?, Entonces Dios.......se sentó y lloró.
Si no mandas este mensaje por lo menos a 1,000,000,000 de personas Enrique Peña Nieto pudiera ser elegido presidente... así que mándaselo a todos los que puedas... o no llores después.
"Yo por si acaso.... Es la primera vez que no rompo una cadena "
26.1.12
21.1.12
Kinder surprise is too dangeros for 'America'
Pictured above is a chocolate novelty called Kinder Surprise or Kinder Joy. It’s a chocolate egg, costing about $2 or $3. Each egg has a little toy inside, measuring no more than an inch or two. While most common in Germany, Italy, and the rest of central Europe, Kinder Surprise can be found around the world — except for the United States, where they’re illegal.
In 1938, the American government passed the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act (FFDCA), a law which, among many many other things, bans the import or manufacture of …
Contraband Confection
In 1938, the American government passed the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act (FFDCA), a law which, among many many other things, bans the import or manufacture of …
Contraband Confection
15.1.12
Occupy Wallstreet is not just a whim...
In his speech to the Occupy Wall Street encampment at Zuccotti Park, Slavoj Žižek lamented that “It’s easy to imagine the end of the world, but we cannot imagine the end of capitalism.” It’s a paraphrase of a remark that Fredric Jameson made some years ago, when the hegemony of neoliberalism still appeared absolute. Yet the very existence of Occupy Wall Street suggests that the end of capitalism has become a bit easier to imagine of late. […]
One thing we can be certain of is that capitalism will end. Maybe not soon, but probably before too long; humanity has never before managed to craft an eternal social system, after all, and capitalism is a notably more precarious and volatile order than most of those that preceded it. The question, then, is what will come next. Rosa Luxemburg, reacting to the beginnings of World War I, cited a line from Engels: “Bourgeois society stands at the crossroads, either transition to socialism or regression into barbarism.” In that spirit I offer a thought experiment, an attempt to make sense of our possible futures. These are a few of the socialisms we may reach if a resurgent Left is successful, and the barbarisms we may be consigned to if we fail. […]
There are therefore four logical combinations of the two oppositions, resource abundance vs. scarcity and egalitarianism vs. hierarchy. To put things in somewhat vulgar-Marxist terms, the first axis dictates the economic base of the post-capitalist future, while the second pertains to the socio-political superstructure. Two possible futures are socialisms (only one of which I will actually call by that name) while the other two are contrasting flavors of barbarism.
read the whole article at Four Futures
One thing we can be certain of is that capitalism will end. Maybe not soon, but probably before too long; humanity has never before managed to craft an eternal social system, after all, and capitalism is a notably more precarious and volatile order than most of those that preceded it. The question, then, is what will come next. Rosa Luxemburg, reacting to the beginnings of World War I, cited a line from Engels: “Bourgeois society stands at the crossroads, either transition to socialism or regression into barbarism.” In that spirit I offer a thought experiment, an attempt to make sense of our possible futures. These are a few of the socialisms we may reach if a resurgent Left is successful, and the barbarisms we may be consigned to if we fail. […]
There are therefore four logical combinations of the two oppositions, resource abundance vs. scarcity and egalitarianism vs. hierarchy. To put things in somewhat vulgar-Marxist terms, the first axis dictates the economic base of the post-capitalist future, while the second pertains to the socio-political superstructure. Two possible futures are socialisms (only one of which I will actually call by that name) while the other two are contrasting flavors of barbarism.
read the whole article at Four Futures
11.1.12
overpopuation in China...?? no way!
What if you built a glitzy new town but no one turned up to live in it? That is the state of affairs at Kangbashi, Hu Yinan discovers in Inner Mongolia.
Like most newcomers to Kangbashi, Wang Yuanyuan was instantly enthralled with its glittering towers, architectural wonders and grand sculpture gardens when she arrived in 2007. The only thing missing was people.
read more… Ghost Town
Like most newcomers to Kangbashi, Wang Yuanyuan was instantly enthralled with its glittering towers, architectural wonders and grand sculpture gardens when she arrived in 2007. The only thing missing was people.
read more… Ghost Town
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)